29 CFR 1910.133 General Industry

Eye & Face Protection

Specific requirements for selection and use of eye and face protective equipment.

43,025
Facilities Cited
$17.7M
Total Penalties
$398.00
Avg Penalty

📊 State Breakdown

New York
3,382 facilities
$1.4M
Ohio
2,992 facilities
$1.0M
North Carolina
2,984 facilities
$1.1M
Pennsylvania
2,843 facilities
$1.2M
Texas
2,327 facilities
$1.3M
Illinois
2,001 facilities
$950.4K
New Jersey
1,886 facilities
$1.1M
Minnesota
1,754 facilities
$495.3K
Florida
1,629 facilities
$916.1K
Massachusetts
1,304 facilities
$467.5K
Georgia
1,256 facilities
$1.1M
Tennessee
1,245 facilities
$357.3K
South Carolina
1,218 facilities
$277.1K
Connecticut
1,159 facilities
$382.3K
Wisconsin
1,138 facilities
$443.9K

🏭 Top Facilities — 29 CFR 1910.133 Violations

Understanding This Standard

OSHA standard 1910.133, 'Eye and Face Protection,' is a critical component of personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, designed to safeguard workers from a wide range of hazards that could cause eye or face injuries. This standard mandates that employers ensure employees use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to hazards such as flying objects, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.

The core requirement of 1910.133 is that protective eye and face devices must comply with ANSI/ISEA Z87.1-2010 (or later equivalent) and be marked accordingly. This ensures the equipment meets specific performance criteria for impact resistance, optical quality, and coverage. Employers must also ensure that eye and face protection is suitable for the hazard presented. For example, safety spectacles with side shields might be adequate for flying particles, but chemical splash goggles or a full face shield might be necessary when handling corrosive liquids.

Common violations of 1910.133 often include failure to provide any eye protection, providing inadequate protection for the specific hazard (e.g., using safety glasses for chemical splashes), not ensuring employees wear the provided protection, or using damaged or ill-fitting PPE. Another frequent issue is the failure to address prescription lenses; workers needing corrective vision must be provided with protection that incorporates their prescription or can be worn over their prescription glasses without disturbing the fit or function of either.

Penalties for violating 1910.133 can vary significantly based on the severity of the violation and the employer's history. While the average penalty is around $398, a single severe violation, especially one leading to serious injury, can incur fines upwards of $80,000. Compliance with 1910.133 is not just about avoiding penalties; it's about preventing debilitating eye injuries that can lead to permanent vision impairment or blindness, significantly impacting a worker's quality of life and productivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of hazards require eye and face protection under OSHA 1910.133?

OSHA 1910.133 requires eye and face protection for hazards including flying objects (dust, chips, particles), molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, and potentially injurious light radiation (welding, cutting, brazing).

Does OSHA 1910.133 specify which type of eye protection to use?

While 1910.133 doesn't specify exact types for every scenario, it mandates that protection must be appropriate for the specific hazard encountered and comply with ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 standards. This means employers must conduct a hazard assessment to determine if safety glasses, goggles, face shields, or welding helmets are necessary.

What are an employer's responsibilities regarding prescription eyewear under 1910.133?

Employers must ensure that employees who wear prescription lenses are provided with eye protection that either incorporates the prescription in the protective eyewear itself or can be worn over their prescription lenses without disturbing the proper positioning of either the prescription lenses or the protective device. The protective eyewear must still meet ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 requirements.

#FacilityLocationTotal PenaltiesCitations
1 MIRACAPO PIZZA COMPANY LLC DBA LITTLE LADY FOODS GURNEE, IL $3,102,849.00 32
2 TUBE PRODUCTS, INC. TROY, OH $812,250.00 45
3 NEW RIVER CASTINGS CO., INC. RADFORD, VA $761,000.00 44
4 A. E. STALEY MANUFACTURING CO. DECATUR, IL $720,200.00 369
5 FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC. GAINESVILLE, GA $690,510.60 52
6 ALUMINUM SHAPES, LLC. DELAIR, NJ $674,161.68 176
7 ZMDR LLC LONE JACK, MO $654,490.00 48
8 FRIGIDAIRE HOME PRODUCTS ORANGEBURG, SC $447,092.00 129
9 DEHLER MANUFACTURING CO., INC. CHICAGO, IL $399,025.00 169
10 NEW HORIZONS BAKING COMPANY COLUMBUS, OH $394,849.00 13
11 DOEHLER-JARVIS INCORPORATION TOLEDO, OH $370,615.00 84
12 DYNAMIC TOOL CO., INC. EL PASO, TX $333,100.00 62
13 SHAPIRO PACKING COMPANY, INC. AUGUSTA, GA $332,140.00 135
14 EAST ALABAMA LUMBER COMPANY, INC. LAFAYETTE, AL $315,475.00 20
15 REGAL INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION MILLVILLE, NJ $300,315.50 23
16 PRINZ GRAIN & FEED WEST POINT, NE $299,990.00 20
17 STEEL FABRICATION SERVICES, INC. FARMERS BRANCH, TX $290,760.00 32
18 TRIMAC TRANSPORTATION INC. BEAUMONT, TX $287,500.00 16
19 GUNITE CORPORATION ROCKFORD, IL $284,514.00 158
20 KEY STRUCTURES, LLC PUEBLO, CO $279,209.00 45
21 STONE CONTAINER CORP., A SUBSIDIARY OF SSCC PHILADELPHIA, PA $273,600.00 25
22 DK MANUFACTURING FRAZEYSBURG, INC FRAZEYSBURG, OH $270,618.00 12
23 MOORECO, INC. TEMPLE, TX $260,153.00 27
24 DEMOULAS SUPER MARKETS, INC RINDGE, NH $250,000.00 26
25 GERSTENSLAGER CO. WOOSTER, OH $239,513.60 86

📋 What Is 29 CFR 1910.133?

29 CFR 1910.133 (Eye & Face Protection) is an OSHA regulatory standard under Part 1910 (Occupational Safety and Health Standards). Specific requirements for selection and use of eye and face protective equipment. Violations of this standard can result in penalties ranging from advisory notices to citations exceeding $150,000 for willful violations. Across the SVEP enforcement database, 43,025 facilities have been cited under this standard, accumulating $17.7M in total penalties.

🔍 Research a specific facility

Search the full SVEP enforcement database for detailed violation history, risk scores, and AI-generated compliance analysis.

Search Facilities →