Duty to Have Fall Protection
Requires employers to provide fall protection for workers on walking-working surfaces with unprotected edges.
📊 State Breakdown
🏭 Top Facilities — 29 CFR 1910.28 Violations
Understanding This Standard
OSHA Standard 1910.28, titled 'Duty to have fall protection and falling object protection,' is a cornerstone of workplace safety in general industry, addressing critical hazards associated with falls and falling objects. This standard mandates that employers provide fall protection to employees exposed to fall hazards of 4 feet or more to a lower level, and that they protect employees from falling objects. It outlines various acceptable methods for fall protection, including guardrail systems, safety net systems, and personal fall arrest systems (PFAS), as well as specific requirements for covers, warning line systems, and designated areas.
Common violations of 1910.28 often stem from a lack of proper fall protection where required, inadequate or improperly installed fall protection systems, and insufficient training for employees working at heights. Examples include unguarded open-sided floors, platforms, and runways; unprotected wall openings; lack of covers for floor holes; and failure to provide or ensure the use of PFAS when other methods are not feasible. Another frequent violation involves employers not adequately protecting workers from falling objects, such as tools, materials, or debris, from elevated levels.
Penalties for violating 1910.28 can range significantly depending on the severity and nature of the violation. While the average penalty is around $2,512, severe cases, especially those involving repeated offenses, willful disregard for safety, or incidents resulting in serious injury or fatality, can lead to substantial fines, with a maximum single penalty recorded at $165,514. Repeat and willful violations carry the highest penalties, emphasizing OSHA's commitment to enforcing this critical safety standard.
To comply with 1910.28, employers must first conduct a thorough hazard assessment to identify all areas where employees are exposed to fall hazards of 4 feet or more, or where falling objects pose a risk. Based on this assessment, appropriate fall protection and falling object protection systems must be selected and implemented. This includes ensuring that guardrails meet specific height and strength requirements, safety nets are installed correctly, and PFAS components (anchorage, connectors, body harness) are compatible and inspected regularly. Furthermore, comprehensive training must be provided to all employees who might be exposed to fall hazards, covering the recognition of fall hazards, the proper use and limitations of fall protection equipment, and rescue procedures. Regular inspection and maintenance of all fall protection equipment are also crucial for ongoing compliance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary fall height trigger for general industry under 1910.28?
Under OSHA 1910.28, the primary fall height trigger for requiring fall protection in general industry is 4 feet or more to a lower level. This applies to various scenarios such as open-sided floors, platforms, runways, and excavations.
What are the acceptable methods of fall protection under 1910.28?
OSHA 1910.28 outlines several acceptable methods for fall protection, including guardrail systems, safety net systems, and personal fall arrest systems (PFAS). Other methods like covers for holes, warning line systems, and designated areas may also be used under specific conditions outlined in the standard.
How does 1910.28 address protection from falling objects?
OSHA 1910.28 requires employers to protect employees from falling objects. This can be achieved through various means such as toe boards, screens, guardrail systems, canopies, or barricades, and by requiring employees to wear hard hats when exposed to falling object hazards.
| # | Facility | Location | Total Penalties | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIRACAPO PIZZA COMPANY LLC DBA LITTLE LADY FOODS | GURNEE, IL | $3,102,849.00 | 32 |
| 2 | FLORENCE HARDWOODS, LLC | FLORENCE, WI | $1,351,658.00 | 48 |
| 3 | FRAZER & JONES, LLC | SYRACUSE, NY | $1,010,720.40 | 34 |
| 4 | DOWA THT AMERICA, INC. | BOWLING GREEN, OH | $834,978.00 | 58 |
| 5 | AVONDALE INDUSTRIES INC., STEEL SALES DIV. | HARVEY, LA | $760,800.00 | 146 |
| 6 | FOUNDATION FOOD GROUP, INC. | GAINESVILLE, GA | $690,510.60 | 52 |
| 7 | NOX US, LLC | FOSTORIA, OH | $663,906.00 | 30 |
| 8 | CHAMPION MODULAR, INC. | STRATTANVILLE, PA | $658,900.00 | 36 |
| 9 | THE VALLEY FERTILIZER AND CHEMICAL COMPANY INCORPORATED | MOUNT JACKSON, VA | $516,730.00 | 63 |
| 10 | THE JAMES SKINNER LLC | OMAHA, NE | $486,550.00 | 49 |
| 11 | SCOTT PAPER COMPANY, NORTHEAST DIV. | WINSLOW, ME | $476,080.00 | 131 |
| 12 | TOPFLIGHT GRAIN COOPERATIVE, INC. | ATLANTA, IL | $400,000.00 | 5 |
| 13 | GAVILON GRAIN, LLC | WICHITA, KS | $369,000.00 | 15 |
| 14 | RESOURCE RECYCLING, INC. | LIMA, OH | $361,585.00 | 17 |
| 15 | PILOT INDUSTRIAL BATTERIES, INC. | KANKAKEE, IL | $342,775.00 | 52 |
| 16 | MONFORT, INC. | GARDEN CITY, KS | $334,270.00 | 82 |
| 17 | TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN SEWERAGE AUTHORITY | BELFORD, NJ | $329,700.00 | 40 |
| 18 | FRAZER & JONES COMPANY, INC. | SYRACUSE, NY | $319,112.60 | 70 |
| 19 | ATLANTIC MARINE, INC. | MOBILE, AL | $309,731.90 | 66 |
| 20 | DG RETAIL, LLC | DRACUT, MA | $300,000.00 | 6 |
| 21 | STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC. | MIDLOTHIAN, TX | $291,452.80 | 31 |
| 22 | UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. | NEWARK, DE | $288,856.00 | 8 |
| 23 | LIQUID ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, LLC. | AUSTIN, TX | $287,928.00 | 4 |
| 24 | AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC. | GROVEPORT, OH | $283,279.00 | 32 |
| 25 | HANKOOK TIRE MANUFACTURING TENNESSEE LP | CLARKSVILLE, TN | $282,500.00 | 40 |
📋 What Is 29 CFR 1910.28?
29 CFR 1910.28 (Duty to Have Fall Protection) is an OSHA regulatory standard under Part 1910 (Occupational Safety and Health Standards). Requires employers to provide fall protection for workers on walking-working surfaces with unprotected edges. Violations of this standard can result in penalties ranging from advisory notices to citations exceeding $150,000 for willful violations. Across the SVEP enforcement database, 10,746 facilities have been cited under this standard, accumulating $32.3M in total penalties.
🔍 Research a specific facility
Search the full SVEP enforcement database for detailed violation history, risk scores, and AI-generated compliance analysis.
Search Facilities →