Tier 5 Standard

JOHN CLAYTON CONST

📍 7590 OCHARD VISTA COURT, MIDVALE, UT 84047🏭 Siding Contractors (NAICS 238170)📅 2007-06-22
$1,800.00
Total Penalties
7
Citations
3/100
Risk Score
362
Analysis Words
Enforcement Analysis

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, JOHN CLAYTON CONST — a siding contractors facility located at 7590 OCHARD VISTA COURT, MIDVALE, UT 84047 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 7 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $1,800.00. The inspection case was opened on 2007-06-22.

DOL records document workplace safety violations warranting formal citation under the OSH Act. While classified at the standard enforcement level, all OSHA citations require corrective action and may indicate areas where workplace safety programs should be strengthened.

BLS Injury Data: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022), this industry sector has an occupational injury rate of 2.8 per 100 full-time workers — 4% above the national average of 2.7. The sector fatality rate is 9.6 per 100,000 workers.

Industry Benchmark: The total penalty of $1,800.00 is 50% below the national average of $3,609.14 for facilities in the Construction sector (NAICS 238170). This sector encompasses 532,749 inspected facilities nationwide with aggregate penalties totaling $1,922.8M.

State Context: Within UT, this facility's penalty places it at the 79th percentile among 21,375 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $1,557.94.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 7 citations spanning 2 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 7 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning October 18, 2007 with the latest abatement deadline set for December 6, 2007. Of the 7 total citations, 7 (100%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, indicating substantial compliance with corrective action requirements.

Penalty Assessment: The total proposed penalty of $1,800.00 falls within OSHA's standard enforcement range and may have been adjusted through informal settlement conference procedures, penalty reduction factors, or good faith credit for demonstrated safety and health management systems.

Industry Benchmark (UT)

This facility's $1,800 penalty is higher than 59% of all penalized companies in the NAICS 238170 industry in UT. The state average penalty for this industry is $3,539.

$3,539
State Avg
$1,800
This Facility
Citation Matrix — 7 Citations
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(01)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $600.00Gravity: 10Issued: November 8, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(02)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: nanIssued: November 8, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(01)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 18, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(03)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 18, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(01)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 18, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(06)
Scaffolding Safety Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $600.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 18, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.454(a)
Serious
Penalty: $600.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 18, 2007Abated: ✓ Yes
This report is compiled from publicly available U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data under the Freedom of Information Act. SVEP Navigator is an independent research and analysis platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to OSHA, the Department of Labor, or any federal agency. Information is provided for research, educational, and compliance planning purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Penalty amounts shown are proposed penalties and may have been modified through contest proceedings or settlement.
Local Competitor Benchmark

Comparing penalized facilities in MIDVALE, UT (Exact Industry)

JOHN CLAYTON CONST (This Facility)
$1.8K
7 cit.
UNIVERSAL CONTRACTING LLC
$70.0K
1 cit.
BURBACHS EXTERIOR SPECIALISTS
$800
1 cit.
More UT Enforcement Records
US MAGNESIUM LLC
GRANTSVILLE, UT
$1.2M
72 cit.
SILVER EAGLE REFINING INC
WOODS CROSS, UT
$584.5K
75 cit.
GENEVA STEEL
OREM, UT
$252.6K
215 cit.
KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER
MAGNA, UT
$239.4K
58 cit.
DEL RAY JACKSON CONSTRUCTION
ST GEORGE, UT
$213.5K
12 cit.
Other Inspected Facilities in MIDVALE, UT
UNIVERSAL CONTRACTING LLC
$70.0K
1 cit.
ENRIQUEZ PLASTERING
$19.3K
6 cit.
DOLLAR GENERAL
$14.0K
2 cit.
CELSO GARCIA CONSTRUCTION
$10.0K
3 cit.
NEW IMAGE RESTORATION
$7.5K
4 cit.
Related Guides & Tools
OSHA Fines & Penalties Guide →
How OSHA calculates penalties and maximum fine amounts.
Top 10 OSHA Violations →
The most frequently cited standards nationwide.
Construction Safety Data →
Industry-wide violation stats and rankings.
Penalty Calculator →
Estimate fines by violation type, industry, and size.

Explore more: OSHA enforcement in MIDVALE · Utah data · Search the database · Incident Rate Calculator

Frequently Asked Questions
What OSHA violations was JOHN CLAYTON CONST cited for?

JOHN CLAYTON CONST received 7 citation(s) covering 2 distinct OSHA standards. Total proposed penalties were $1,800.00. The inspection opened on 2007-06-22.

How much was JOHN CLAYTON CONST fined by OSHA?

OSHA proposed penalties of $1,800.00 against JOHN CLAYTON CONST in MIDVALE, UT. Average per citation: $257.14.

Is JOHN CLAYTON CONST a safe workplace?

Based on enforcement records, JOHN CLAYTON CONST has a risk score of 3 out of 100. DOL records document workplace safety violations warranting formal citation under the OSH Act. While classified at the standard enforcement level, all OSHA citations require corrective action and may indicate areas where workplace safety programs should be strengthened.

How does this penalty compare to the industry average?

The average penalty for Siding Contractors facilities is $3,609.14. This facility penalty of $1,800.00 is below the industry average.