J.J. PACIFIC DEVELOPEMENT CORP.

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, J.J. PACIFIC DEVELOPEMENT CORP. — a industry sector 00 facility located at ACROSS FROM DPW AT 542 N. MARINE DRIVE, TAMUNING, GU 96911 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 12 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $120,870.00. The inspection case was opened on 1994-02-15.

This facility represents one of the most severe enforcement actions in the OSHA SVEP database. Willful violations combined with penalties exceeding $100,000 indicate a pattern of deliberate non-compliance that poses an imminent danger to workers.

State Context: Within GU, this facility's penalty places it at the 100th percentile among 5,525 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $3,014.32.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 12 citations spanning 5 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 5 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition. 5 willful — The employer intentionally and knowingly committed the violation, demonstrating either an intentional disregard for the requirements of the OSH Act or plain indifference to employee safety and health. 2 other-than-serious — The violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but is unlikely to cause death or serious physical harm.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning June 30, 1994 with the latest abatement deadline set for July 20, 1994. Of the 12 total citations, 0 (0%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, which may indicate ongoing compliance gaps requiring further regulatory attention.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $120,870.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $10,072.50 falls within the standard penalty range.

The 1994 enforcement action against J.J. Pacific Development Corp. represents a severe administrative intervention, characterized by