Tier 2 Severe

HARMON CORPORATION

📍 LEO PALACE RESORT, CONDO B, YONA, GU 96915🏭 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction (NAICS 236220)📅 2004-03-29
$48,500.00
Total Penalties
5
Citations
46/100
Risk Score
454
Analysis Words
Enforcement Analysis

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, HARMON CORPORATION — a commercial and institutional building construction facility located at LEO PALACE RESORT, CONDO B, YONA, GU 96915 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 5 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $48,500.00. The inspection case was opened on 2004-03-29.

Federal investigators determined that one or more violations at this facility were committed willfully — meaning the employer either knowingly failed to comply with OSHA standards or acted with plain indifference to employee safety. Willful violations carry the highest penalty multipliers under the OSH Act.

BLS Injury Data: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022), this industry sector has an occupational injury rate of 2.8 per 100 full-time workers — 4% above the national average of 2.7. The sector fatality rate is 9.6 per 100,000 workers.

Industry Benchmark: The total penalty of $48,500.00 is more than 13.4× the national average of $3,609.14 for facilities in the Construction sector (NAICS 236220). This sector encompasses 532,749 inspected facilities nationwide with aggregate penalties totaling $1,922.8M.

State Context: Within GU, this facility's penalty places it at the 99th percentile among 5,525 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $3,014.32.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 5 citations spanning 4 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 4 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition. 1 willful — The employer intentionally and knowingly committed the violation, demonstrating either an intentional disregard for the requirements of the OSH Act or plain indifference to employee safety and health.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning December 15, 2003 with the latest abatement deadline set for January 20, 2004. Of the 5 total citations, 4 (80%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, indicating substantial compliance with corrective action requirements.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $48,500.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $9,700.00 falls within the standard penalty range.

The enforcement record for Harmon Corporation’s project at the Leo Palace Resort reveals a high-stakes failure in foundational safety management, characterized by a stark disparity between routine site hazards and a severe, localized systemic breakdown. The $48,500 penalty landscape was dominated by a single Willful violation of 1910.

Citation Matrix — 5 Citations
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(01)
Excavation & Trenching
Serious
Penalty: $900.00Gravity: 01Issued: December 15, 2003Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(01)
Excavation & Trenching
Serious
Penalty: $900.00Gravity: 01Issued: December 15, 2003Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(01)
Serious
Penalty: $1,200.00Gravity: 02Issued: December 15, 2003Abated: Pending
29 CFR 1926.50(c)
Serious
Penalty: $1,500.00Gravity: 03Issued: December 15, 2003Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(01)
Powered Industrial Trucks (Forklifts)
Willful
Penalty: $44,000.00Gravity: 03Issued: December 15, 2003Abated: ✓ Yes
This report is compiled from publicly available U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data under the Freedom of Information Act. SVEP Navigator is an independent research and analysis platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to OSHA, the Department of Labor, or any federal agency. Information is provided for research, educational, and compliance planning purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Penalty amounts shown are proposed penalties and may have been modified through contest proceedings or settlement.
More GU Enforcement Records
SAMSUNG GUAM INC.
TAMUNING, GU
$1.9M
122 cit.
GIANT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BARRIGADA, GU
$503.3K
16 cit.
MILO CORPORATION
AGANA, GU
$299.0K
9 cit.
PEPSI GUAM BOTTLING
TAMUNING, GU
$248.5K
20 cit.
HANJIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
TAMUNING, GU
$235.6K
31 cit.