Workplace safety enforcement data for 1,673 inspected facilities in FREDERICK.
FREDERICK, Maryland has 1673 OSHA-inspected facilities with cumulative penalties totaling $2.9M. The city's average penalty of $1,741.31 is above the Maryland state average of $1,448.20. Federal investigators have documented 9671 total citations across facilities in FREDERICK.
Analyst Commentary
In Frederick, Maryland, the scale of OSHA enforcement activity is substantial and indicative of a rigorous regulatory environment, with 1,673 inspected facilities resulting in a staggering 9,671 total citations. This high volume of oversight has generated cumulative penalties of $2,913,206, though the average penalty remains relatively modest at $1,741.31 per instance. Given Frederick’s economic profile—which is anchored by a robust biotechnology and life sciences corridor, specialized manufacturing, and rapid residential construction—these violations likely stem from complex laboratory chemical hygiene, machinery safeguarding, and fall protection protocols. For compliance professionals operating in this region, the data reveals a critical insight: the high citation-to-inspection ratio (averaging nearly
Frederick, Maryland, presents a significant OSHA enforcement landscape, with 1673 facilities under scrutiny. The city has seen total penalties reach $2,913,206, indicating a proactive stance by OSHA in addressing workplace safety and health deficiencies. This substantial figure underscores the financial implications of non-compliance for local businesses and highlights the agency's commitment to deterrence through monetary sanctions. The top employer identified in terms of OSHA enforcement activity is CRUZ QUALITY FRAMING, LLC, whose repeated or severe violations likely contribute significantly to the overall penalty statistics, serving as a cautionary example for other construction-related firms in the area regarding safety protocols. The most common violation observed in Frederick is 19100212, which pertains to machine guarding requirements. In plain English, this means many local workplaces fail to adequately protect workers from hazards posed by moving machine parts, such as rotating shafts, flying chips, or ingoing nip points. This commonality suggests a systemic issue with equipment safety and maintenance across various industries. For both workers and employers in Frederick, this data is critical: it empowers workers to recognize prevalent risks and demand safer conditions, while urging employers to prioritize robust machine guarding programs to prevent injuries and avoid costly penalties, fostering a safer working environment for all.
| # | Facility | Penalties | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CRUZ QUALITY FRAMING, LLC | $76.4K | 21 |
| 2 | DANIEL CATALAN | $73.6K | 10 |
| 3 | ALB CONSTRUCTION LLC | $63.4K | 7 |
| 4 | INAY BROTHER'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC | $46.4K | 16 |
| 5 | NETO MASONRY LLC | $36.8K | 8 |
| 6 | GILBERTO GARCIA MORAN | $30.8K | 12 |
| 7 | S & F CONSTRUCTION, LLC | $28.7K | 8 |
| 8 | TOBIAS FLORES | $28.0K | 13 |
| 9 | RUDY ARAGON | $23.7K | 11 |
| 10 | VANEGAS, GERSON G | $23.6K | 9 |
| 11 | ABILIO SANTOS | $21.8K | 15 |
| 12 | JVR CONSTRUCTION LLC | $21.0K | 15 |
| 13 | DAIRY MAID DAIRY, LLC | $20.3K | 57 |
| 14 | GERARDO SABILLON POWER | $20.1K | 11 |
| 15 | JOSE CEDILLO EDENILSON | $19.8K | 16 |
| 16 | MERIDA ESTRADA | $19.6K | 17 |
| 17 | FLYING DOG BREWERY LLLP | $19.3K | 53 |
| 18 | MARCO T. ALVAREZ | $19.0K | 13 |
| 19 | ASB GENERAL CONTRACTING, L.L.C. | $18.2K | 7 |
| 20 | JOSE JULIO MARTINEZ | $18.0K | 5 |