Manufacturing Industry OSHA Enforcement Data
A comprehensive analysis of 159,458 manufacturing facilities inspected by OSHA, revealing 1,186,374 violations and $1.18 billion in penalties. Manufacturing carries the highest per-facility penalty rate of any major industry — 2× higher than construction.
These are the OSHA standards most frequently violated across all manufacturing inspections, ranked by citation count. Note that Machine Guarding (1910.212) ranks 4th in citations but 2nd in total penalties — reflecting the severity of consequences.
The top 10 manufacturing facilities with the highest cumulative OSHA penalties. BP Products North America's Texas City refinery is a significant outlier following the 2005 explosion that killed 15 workers.
| # | Company | Violations | Penalties |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
BP Products North AmericaOutlier Texas City, TX · Petroleum Refining |
1,215 | $38,060,000 |
| 2 |
CITGO Petroleum LCMC Sulphur, LA · Petroleum Refining |
437 | $5,920,000 |
| 3 |
Imperial Sugar Company Port Wentworth, GA · Sugar Refining |
158 | $4,060,000 |
| 4 |
Miracapo Pizza Company Gurnee, IL · Food Manufacturing |
32 | $3,100,000 |
| 5 |
MDLG Inc Phenix City, AL · Manufacturing |
51 | $2,690,000 |
| 6 |
Joon LLC Cusseta, AL · Manufacturing |
55 | $2,550,000 |
| 7 |
BP Products North America Oregon, OH · Petroleum Refining |
39 | $2,420,000 |
| 8 |
Tesoro Petroleum Anacortes, WA · Petroleum Refining |
45 | $2,390,000 |
| 9 |
Didion Milling Cambria, WI · Grain Milling |
62 | $2,190,000 |
| 10 |
Imperial Sugar Company Gramercy, LA · Sugar Refining |
112 | $2,000,000 |
Total OSHA penalties assessed against manufacturing facilities, ranked by state. Texas and California lead due to large petrochemical and food processing sectors.
| # | State | Total Penalties | Penalty Bar |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $122,000,000 | |
| 2 | California | $114,000,000 | |
| 3 | Ohio | $93,000,000 | |
| 4 | Illinois | $64,000,000 | |
| 5 | Pennsylvania | $56,000,000 | |
| 6 | Wisconsin | $52,000,000 | |
| 7 | Georgia | $48,000,000 | |
| 8 | New York | $46,000,000 | |
| 9 | Michigan | $42,000,000 | |
| 10 | New Jersey | $34,000,000 | |
| 11 | Alabama | $34,000,000 | |
| 12 | North Carolina | $30,000,000 | |
| 13 | Florida | $29,000,000 | |
| 14 | Missouri | $26,000,000 | |
| 15 | Virginia | $26,000,000 |
Heavy Equipment & Machinery
- Complex lockout/tagout requirements for multi-energy machines
- Machine guarding violations carry the highest individual fines — $114M total
- Mechanical power transmission apparatus requires constant maintenance
- Powered industrial trucks (forklifts) create ongoing exposure risk
Chemical & Respiratory Hazards
- Hazard Communication (HazCom) is the 2nd most cited standard: 69,369 citations
- Respiratory protection programs require medical evaluations, fit testing, and training
- Process Safety Management (PSM) for facilities handling highly hazardous chemicals
- Dust explosions (sugar, grain, metal) have caused catastrophic incidents
Electrical & Energy Hazards
- Electrical wiring methods (1910.305) and general electrical (1910.303) combine for $43M in penalties
- High-voltage equipment in manufacturing environments increases arc flash risk
- Multiple energy sources per machine compound lockout/tagout complexity
Cumulative Violation Effect
- Manufacturing averages 7.4 violations per facility — the highest of any sector
- Single inspections often uncover LOTO, machine guarding, electrical, AND PPE violations
- Repeat violations trigger penalty multipliers up to 10× the base amount
🔒 Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) — 1910.147
The #1 cited standard in manufacturing with 70,299 citations and $125 million in penalties. LOTO requires employers to establish energy control procedures for servicing and maintaining machines and equipment. Violations typically involve: missing written energy control procedures, inadequate employee training, failure to use lockout/tagout devices during servicing, and lack of periodic inspections. Manufacturing facilities with multiple energy sources (electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, thermal) face the most complex compliance requirements.
⚙️ Machine Guarding — 1910.212
Despite ranking 4th in total citations (51,148), machine guarding violations generate the 2nd highest penalties at $114 million — reflecting the severity of injuries caused by unguarded machines. Common violations include unguarded points of operation on power presses, missing barrier guards on cutting machines, and inadequate protection around rotating parts. The penalty per violation for machine guarding is among the highest of all standards.
⚠️ Hazard Communication — 1910.1200
The 2nd most cited standard with 69,369 citations. HazCom requires manufacturers to maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all hazardous chemicals, label containers properly, and train employees on chemical hazards. The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) update increased enforcement scrutiny on label formatting and SDS accessibility. Manufacturing facilities using solvents, adhesives, paints, or processing chemicals are particularly vulnerable.
😷 Respiratory Protection — 1910.134
With 51,915 citations, respiratory protection is the 3rd most cited standard. Manufacturing operations generating dust, fumes, mists, or vapors must implement comprehensive respiratory protection programs including: medical evaluations, fit testing, proper respirator selection, and training. Industries such as metal fabrication, chemical processing, and woodworking face the highest citation rates.
Top 10 Most Common OSHA Violations
The most cited standards across all industries and how they compare to manufacturing-specific data.
OSHA Fines & Penalties Explained
How OSHA calculates penalties, severity adjustments, and why manufacturing fines are typically higher.
OSHA Violation Lookup
Search any facility's full OSHA enforcement history — violations, penalties, and inspection details.
Search Manufacturing Facility Records
Look up any manufacturing company's OSHA inspection history, violations, penalties, and risk score from our database of 2.3 million facilities.
Search FacilitiesLast updated: July 2026
Note: Penalty amounts reflect assessed penalties and may differ from final amounts after settlements or informal conferences. Manufacturing industry classification is based on NAICS codes 31-33.