NEVADA RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC.

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, NEVADA RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC. — a industry sector 00 facility located at 18000 EAST US HWY 93 SOUTH, BOULDER CITY, NV 89005 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 27 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $33,040.00. The inspection case was opened on 2002-04-18.

The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.

State Context: Within NV, this facility's penalty places it at the 99th percentile among 27,382 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $1,830.01.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 27 citations spanning 11 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 4 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition. 11 other-than-serious — The violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but is unlikely to cause death or serious physical harm.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning May 3, 2002 with the latest abatement deadline set for August 9, 2014. Of the 27 total citations, 12 (44%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, which may indicate ongoing compliance gaps requiring further regulatory attention.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $33,040.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $1,223.70 falls within the standard penalty range.

The enforcement record for Nevada Restaurant Services, Inc. reveals a facility burdened by systemic safety fragmentation, evidenced by a high volume of twenty-seven citations spanning disparate regulatory domains. The gravity of the $3,430 penalty for respiratory protection (1910.134) signifies a critical failure to implement a written program, leaving workers exposed to unmonitored atmospheric hazards. This major violation, coupled with serious citations regarding lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures under 1910.147, indicates that the employer failed to establish the foundational administrative controls necessary to prevent catastrophic energy release or long-term respiratory illness. The penalty total of $33,040 is significantly higher than the industry average for hospitality-related entities, suggesting that inspectors identified an environment of pervasive neglect rather than isolated mechanical failures. Furthermore, the interplay between electrical standards (1910.303, 1910.305) and bloodborne pathogen protocols (1910.1030) points to a breakdown in specialized safety training. While many violations were classified as "Other-than-Serious," their cumulative breadth—covering noise exposure, hazard communication, and machine guarding—demonstrates a lack of a cohesive Safety and Health Management System (SHMS). For compliance professionals, this profile suggests a "compliance vacuum" where management failed to conduct the requisite hazard assessments required under 1910.132. The data indicates a reactive safety culture that prioritized operational continuity over the technical rigors of OSHA’s General Industry standards, creating a high-risk environment for both acute traumatic injury and chronic occupational exposure.