MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES — a industry sector 00 facility located at 2700 NEVILLE ROAD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15225 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 9 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $101,000.00. The inspection case was opened on 1996-01-18.

Cumulative penalties significantly exceed the national median for OSHA enforcement actions. The penalty amount suggests multiple high-gravity citations, indicating conditions that presented a substantial probability of death or serious physical harm to employees.

State Context: Within PA, this facility's penalty places it at the 100th percentile among 84,409 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $3,015.83.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 9 citations spanning 5 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 9 unclassified — A technical violation that does not fit neatly into the standard classification categories.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning July 16, 1996 with the latest abatement deadline set for July 19, 1996. Of the 9 total citations, 9 (100%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, indicating substantial compliance with corrective action requirements.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $101,000.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $11,222.22 falls within the standard penalty range.

The 1996 enforcement action against Martin Marietta Aggregates’ Pittsburgh facility represented a significant regulatory intervention, characterized by a concentrated penalty structure that signaled egregious non-compliance. The assessment of a $101,000 penalty for a single violation set, coupled with maximum gravity ratings across nine distinct citations, indicated a profound breakdown in maritime operational safety. The preponderance of violations under 29 CFR 1918.74, concerning cranes and derricks, suggests that workers were exposed to catastrophic mechanical failure risks, likely involving uncertified or improperly maintained heavy lifting equipment. By citing standards related to gear certification (1918.12), chain slings (1918.64), and freight handling (1918.61), OSHA identified a systemic failure in the facility’s material handling infrastructure. The financial severity of