J.M. STEEL ERECTING, INC.

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, J.M. STEEL ERECTING, INC. — a industry sector 00 facility located at CORNER OF ALWARD & ALDRICH ST MILCON PROJECT P441, YUMA, AZ 85369 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 5 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $48,000.00. The inspection case was opened on 1992-06-17.

Federal investigators determined that one or more violations at this facility were committed willfully — meaning the employer either knowingly failed to comply with OSHA standards or acted with plain indifference to employee safety. Willful violations carry the highest penalty multipliers under the OSH Act.

State Context: Within AZ, this facility's penalty places it at the 100th percentile among 28,263 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $1,378.92.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 5 citations spanning 2 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 5 willful — The employer intentionally and knowingly committed the violation, demonstrating either an intentional disregard for the requirements of the OSH Act or plain indifference to employee safety and health.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning September 11, 1992 with the latest abatement deadline set for September 14, 1992. Of the 5 total citations, 0 (0%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, which may indicate ongoing compliance gaps requiring further regulatory attention.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $48,000.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $9,600.00 falls within the standard penalty range.

The enforcement profile for J.M. Steel Erecting, Inc. following the 1992 inspection at the Milcon Project P441 reveals a profound breakdown in safety leadership and a high-gravity risk environment. The issuance of five distinct Willful violations—the most