HOPLAND PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, HOPLAND PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT — a sewage treatment facilities facility located at 13769 HWY 101, HOPLAND, CA 95449 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 12 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $300.00. The inspection case was opened on 2009-04-09.
The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.
BLS Injury Data: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022), this industry sector has an occupational injury rate of 2.4 per 100 full-time workers — near the national average of 2.7. The sector fatality rate is 7.0 per 100,000 workers.
EPA Environmental Record: The EPA shows no current violations for this facility. Source: EPA ECHO database.
Industry Benchmark: The total penalty of $300.00 is 93% below the national average of $4,328.89 for facilities in the Utilities sector (NAICS 221320). This sector encompasses 8,952 inspected facilities nationwide with aggregate penalties totaling $38.8M.
State Context: Within CA, this facility's penalty places it at the 34th percentile among 184,062 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $3,010.44.
Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 12 citations spanning 6 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 12 other-than-serious — The violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but is unlikely to cause death or serious physical harm.
Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning June 19, 2009 with the latest abatement deadline set for July 17, 2009. Of the 12 total citations, 12 (100%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, indicating substantial compliance with corrective action requirements.
Penalty Assessment: The total proposed penalty of $300.00 falls within OSHA's standard enforcement range and may have been adjusted through informal settlement conference procedures, penalty reduction factors, or good faith credit for demonstrated safety and health management systems.