GILMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, GILMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. — a industry sector 00 facility located at 155 GLEN COVE ROAD, GLEN COVE, NY 11542 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 16 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $20,400.00. The inspection case was opened on 1998-11-18.

The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.

State Context: Within NY, this facility's penalty places it at the 99th percentile among 140,736 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $2,208.33.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 16 citations spanning 1 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 8 unclassified — A technical violation that does not fit neatly into the standard classification categories. 7 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning May 17, 1999 with the latest abatement deadline set for October 30, 1999. Of the 16 total citations, 2 (13%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, which may indicate ongoing compliance gaps requiring further regulatory attention.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $20,400.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $1,275.00 falls within the standard penalty range.

The 1998 inspection of Gilman Construction Co., Inc. revealed a comprehensive and systemic collapse of regulatory compliance concerning 29 CFR 1926.1101, the OSHA standard for asbestos in construction. The distribution of sixteen citations across nearly every critical subpart of the standard—ranging from initial exposure assessments and regulated area establishment to respiratory protection, hygiene facilities, and medical surveillance—indicates that the employer failed to implement