EXTERIOR DESIGNS INC.

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, EXTERIOR DESIGNS INC. — a industry sector 00 facility located at 1228-1230 ELM ST., MANCHESTER, NH 03104 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 13 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $25,800.00. The inspection case was opened on 1999-10-07.

The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.

State Context: Within NH, this facility's penalty places it at the 98th percentile among 12,674 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $3,397.44.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 13 citations spanning 4 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 8 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition. 3 other-than-serious — The violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but is unlikely to cause death or serious physical harm. 1 unclassified — A technical violation that does not fit neatly into the standard classification categories. 1 repeat — A substantially similar violation was found during a previous inspection and the original citation has become a final order.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning November 24, 1999 with the latest abatement deadline set for December 26, 2000. Of the 13 total citations, 8 (62%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, suggesting partial progress toward required corrective actions.

Penalty Assessment: The cumulative penalty of $25,800.00 reflects OSHA's gravity-based penalty calculation methodology, which considers the severity of potential injury, the probability of occurrence, the employer's size, good faith, and violation history. The per-citation average of $1,984.62 falls within the standard penalty range.

The inspection of Exterior Designs Inc. revealed a pervasive and systemic failure to manage fall hazards, primarily centered on