Tier 4 Systematic

CM STEEL PROCESSING INC.

📍 352 SOUTH MAIN STREET, CLEARFIELD, UT 84015🏭 Custom Roll Forming (NAICS 332114)📅 2011-12-05
$5,250.00
Total Penalties
13
Citations
17/100
Risk Score
363
Analysis Words
Enforcement Analysis

According to U.S. Department of Labor enforcement records, CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. — a custom roll forming facility located at 352 SOUTH MAIN STREET, CLEARFIELD, UT 84015 — was the subject of a formal OSHA inspection that resulted in 13 citation(s) and cumulative proposed penalties of $5,250.00. The inspection case was opened on 2011-12-05.

The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.

BLS Injury Data: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022), this industry sector has an occupational injury rate of 3.3 per 100 full-time workers — 22% above the national average of 2.7. The sector fatality rate is 2.3 per 100,000 workers.

Industry Benchmark: The total penalty of $5,250.00 is approximately in line with the national average of $6,436.62 for facilities in the Manufacturing sector (NAICS 332114). This sector encompasses 82,943 inspected facilities nationwide with aggregate penalties totaling $533.9M.

State Context: Within UT, this facility's penalty places it at the 95th percentile among 21,375 inspected facilities. The statewide average penalty is $1,557.94.

Citation Analysis: The inspection produced 13 citations spanning 6 distinct OSHA regulatory standards. The citation breakdown includes: 13 serious — A workplace hazard that could cause death or serious physical harm exists, and the employer knew or should have known about the condition.

Enforcement Timeline: Citations were issued beginning October 1, 2009 with the latest abatement deadline set for March 5, 2012. Of the 13 total citations, 13 (100%) have been marked as abated in DOL records, indicating substantial compliance with corrective action requirements.

Penalty Assessment: The total proposed penalty of $5,250.00 falls within OSHA's standard enforcement range and may have been adjusted through informal settlement conference procedures, penalty reduction factors, or good faith credit for demonstrated safety and health management systems.

Citation Matrix — 13 Citations
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(07)
Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout)
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(01)
Powered Industrial Trucks (Forklifts)
Serious
Penalty: $1,000.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(02)
Serious
Penalty: $1,000.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(02)
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(01)
Slings Safety
Serious
Penalty: $1,000.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(03)
Slings Safety
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(04)
Slings Safety
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(01)
Machine Guarding — General Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $1,000.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.219(b)(01)
Mechanical Power Transmission
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 05Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.179(k)(02)
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.179(m)(01)
Serious
Penalty: $0.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(06)
Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout)
Serious
Penalty: $1,000.00Gravity: 10Issued: February 1, 2012Abated: ✓ Yes
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(01)
Machine Guarding — General Requirements
Serious
Penalty: $250.00Gravity: 10Issued: October 1, 2009Abated: ✓ Yes
This report is compiled from publicly available U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data under the Freedom of Information Act. SVEP Navigator is an independent research and analysis platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to OSHA, the Department of Labor, or any federal agency. Information is provided for research, educational, and compliance planning purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Penalty amounts shown are proposed penalties and may have been modified through contest proceedings or settlement.
Local Competitor Benchmark

Comparing penalized facilities in CLEARFIELD, UT (Broader Sector)

CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. (This Facility)
$5.3K
13 cit.
UTILITY TRAILER MFG CO
$22.6K
15 cit.
INTERNATIONAL ROLLFORMS, INC.
$6.7K
25 cit.
C M STEEL PROCESSING INC.
$6.6K
5 cit.
More UT Enforcement Records
US MAGNESIUM LLC
GRANTSVILLE, UT
$1.2M
72 cit.
SILVER EAGLE REFINING INC
WOODS CROSS, UT
$584.5K
75 cit.
GENEVA STEEL
OREM, UT
$252.6K
215 cit.
KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER
MAGNA, UT
$239.4K
58 cit.
DEL RAY JACKSON CONSTRUCTION
ST GEORGE, UT
$213.5K
12 cit.
Other Inspected Facilities in CLEARFIELD, UT
NAPTECH INC.
$75.6K
27 cit.
LIFETIME PRODUCTS
$49.6K
71 cit.
EXCEL CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
$25.8K
30 cit.
UTILITY TRAILER MFG CO
$22.6K
15 cit.
UTILITY TRAILER INC.
$15.8K
36 cit.
Related Guides & Tools
OSHA Fines & Penalties Guide →
How OSHA calculates penalties and maximum fine amounts.
After an OSHA Inspection →
Citations, appeals, and penalty negotiation steps.
Top 10 OSHA Violations →
The most frequently cited standards nationwide.
Manufacturing Safety Data →
Industry-wide violation stats and rankings.

Explore more: OSHA enforcement in CLEARFIELD · Utah data · Search the database · Incident Rate Calculator

Frequently Asked Questions
What OSHA violations was CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. cited for?

CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. received 13 citation(s) covering 6 distinct OSHA standards. Total proposed penalties were $5,250.00. The inspection opened on 2011-12-05.

How much was CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. fined by OSHA?

OSHA proposed penalties of $5,250.00 against CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. in CLEARFIELD, UT. Average per citation: $403.85.

Is CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. a safe workplace?

Based on enforcement records, CM STEEL PROCESSING INC. has a risk score of 17 out of 100. The volume of citations issued during this inspection suggests systematic compliance deficiencies rather than isolated incidents. Facilities with 10 or more citations typically face comprehensive abatement requirements and may be subject to follow-up inspections.

How does this penalty compare to the industry average?

The average penalty for Custom Roll Forming facilities is $6,436.62. This facility penalty of $5,250.00 is below the industry average.