Workplace safety enforcement data for 231 inspected facilities in BATH.
BATH, Maine has 231 OSHA-inspected facilities with cumulative penalties totaling $2.0M. The city's average penalty of $8,638.60 is significantly above the state average of $3,022.91. Federal investigators have documented 1425 total citations across facilities in BATH.
Analyst Commentary
OSHA enforcement data for Bath, Maine, reveals a substantial regulatory footprint, with 231 inspected facilities resulting in 1,425 total citations and cumulative penalties reaching $1,995,516. This high volume of citations relative to the number of inspections suggests that federal oversight is particularly rigorous in this region. Given Bath’s economic reliance on heavy industrial sectors, most notably shipbuilding and maritime manufacturing, these violations likely stem from complex operational hazards such as fall protection, confined space entry, and hazardous energy control. With an average penalty of $8,638.60 per inspection, compliance professionals must recognize that OSHA is identifying multiple systemic failures during each site visit rather than isolated incidents. The primary insight for local safety managers is the necessity of implementing robust, proactive internal auditing; since the data reflects a high citation-to-inspection ratio, facilities should focus on comprehensive safety management systems to mitigate the risk of compounding fines that could significantly impact operational budgets.
Bath, Maine, presents a focused OSHA enforcement landscape, reflecting the city's industrial profile. With 231 facilities tracked, the total penalties levied stand at a significant $1,995,516. This figure underscores OSHA's commitment to ensuring compliance and workplace safety within Bath, signaling to local businesses that robust safety protocols are not merely advisory, but legally enforced. The substantial penalty total indicates that violations, when identified, often carry significant financial repercussions, impacting operational budgets and potentially reputation. The top employer, Bath Iron Works, is particularly notable due to its large-scale shipbuilding operations, which inherently involve complex and high-risk activities. Such an environment necessitates stringent safety management to protect its extensive workforce. The most common violation type observed is 19260501, which pertains to fall protection in construction. In plain English, this means that a recurring issue in Bath is employers failing to provide adequate safeguards, such as guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems, to prevent workers from falling from elevated surfaces. This data is critical for both workers and employers in Bath, as it highlights specific high-risk areas requiring immediate attention and proactive mitigation strategies to prevent serious injuries or fatalities.
| # | Facility | Penalties | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BATH IRON WORKS | $1.1M | 591 |
| 2 | WEEKS MARINE, INC. | $254.0K | 7 |
| 3 | GENERAL DYNAMICS BATH IRON WORKS | $190.2K | 34 |
| 4 | LESSARD BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION INC. | $40.7K | 3 |
| 5 | ATKINSON CONSTRUCTION | $18.0K | 6 |
| 6 | SMOKEY'S GREATER SHOWS INC. | $17.2K | 13 |
| 7 | INTEGRITY ROOFING & SIDING | $13.9K | 4 |
| 8 | GENERAL DYNAMICS | $12.9K | 2 |
| 9 | ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION | $12.3K | 5 |
| 10 | KENNEBEC CABINETRY INC. | $11.2K | 9 |
| 11 | LU CONSTRUCTION, INC. | $11.0K | 3 |
| 12 | DAVID J. DESCHAINE INSTALLATIONS INC. | $7.4K | 3 |
| 13 | EASTERN MECHANICAL INC. | $7.0K | 2 |
| 14 | SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. | $7.0K | 3 |
| 15 | MANUAL CONSTRUCTION | $6.5K | 3 |
| 16 | LAMOREAU IMPROVEMENTS INC. | $6.5K | 6 |
| 17 | CCB, INC. | $6.3K | 1 |
| 18 | FLATIRON STRUCTURES COMPANY | $6.3K | 2 |
| 19 | HILLHOUSE, INC | $6.0K | 5 |
| 20 | BISSON MOVING & STORAGE CO. | $5.7K | 18 |